FREE delivery to all EXCLUSIVE BOOKS stores nationwide. FREE delivery to your door on all orders over R450. Excludes all international deliveries.

Listening to Reason in Plato and Aristotle

Dominic Scott
    Product form
      FORMAT: Hardback

      R 4,641.00 Price and availability exclusive to website

      YOU COULD EARN 4,641 FUTURE RETAIL DISCOUNTS.
      ESTIMATED DELIVERY: Back-order only, ETA unknown but significant delays
      BUY NOW PAY LATER
      From R 773.50 per month!
      3x monthly payments of R 1,547.00 with
      4x fortnightly payments of R 1,160.25 with
      Focusing on Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, this book compares their views on the persuasiveness of moral argument: how far did they think it could reach beyond a narrow circle of believers and influence people more generally? Answering this question requires a wide-ranging approach, which examines their views on such topics as rationality, moral psychology, rhetoric, education, and gender. The first part ofthe book shows that for Plato certain kinds of argument are beyond the reach of most people, specifically arguments that make appeal to transcendent Forms. But he still thought that there is another level of argument, restricted to human psychology and politics, which could have a much wider appeal, especially ifsupplemented by the appropriate rhetoric. The second half of the book turns to the Nicomachean Ethics to determine Aristotle's views about the reach of moral argument, as well as its purposes. He is certainly very restrictive when it comes to the kinds of argument pursued in the work itself, proposing to talk only to those who are mature in years and well brought up. Like Plato, however, he also allows for the possibility of another type of discourse, which is more rhetoricalin nature and could benefit those who are less mature. Though mainly focused on the Republic and Nicomachean Ethics, this book also examines relevant passages from Plato's Laws and Aristotle's Politics.
      Format: CONTRIBUTORS: Dominic Scott EAN: 9780198863328 COUNTRY: United Kingdom PAGES: WEIGHT: 594 g HEIGHT: 23 cm
      PUBLISHED BY: Oxford University Press DATE PUBLISHED: 2020-11-02 CITY: GENRE: LITERARY CRITICISM / Ancient & Classical, PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical, PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy WIDTH: 165 cm SPINE:

      Book Themes:

      Literary studies: ancient, classical and medieval, Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, Ethics and moral philosophy

      Customer Reviews

      Be the first to write a review
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      Dominic Scott is a professor of philosophy at Oxford University, having worked as a lecturer at Cambridge University and then a professor at the University of Virginia. He has also held visiting positions at Princeton, Harvard, and the Center for Hellenic Studies Washington DC. In 2001-3 he was a British Academy Research Reader and in 2016 a Humboldt Fellow based in Munich. He has written three monographs on ancient philosophy and edited two further books, as well asco-authoring The Humanities World Report 2015.
      Focusing on Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, this book compares their views on the persuasiveness of moral argument: how far did they think it could reach beyond a narrow circle of believers and influence people more generally? Answering this question requires a wide-ranging approach, which examines their views on such topics as rationality, moral psychology, rhetoric, education, and gender. The first part ofthe book shows that for Plato certain kinds of argument are beyond the reach of most people, specifically arguments that make appeal to transcendent Forms. But he still thought that there is another level of argument, restricted to human psychology and politics, which could have a much wider appeal, especially ifsupplemented by the appropriate rhetoric. The second half of the book turns to the Nicomachean Ethics to determine Aristotle's views about the reach of moral argument, as well as its purposes. He is certainly very restrictive when it comes to the kinds of argument pursued in the work itself, proposing to talk only to those who are mature in years and well brought up. Like Plato, however, he also allows for the possibility of another type of discourse, which is more rhetoricalin nature and could benefit those who are less mature. Though mainly focused on the Republic and Nicomachean Ethics, this book also examines relevant passages from Plato's Laws and Aristotle's Politics.
      Format: CONTRIBUTORS: Dominic Scott EAN: 9780198863328 COUNTRY: United Kingdom PAGES: WEIGHT: 594 g HEIGHT: 23 cm
      PUBLISHED BY: Oxford University Press DATE PUBLISHED: 2020-11-02 CITY: GENRE: LITERARY CRITICISM / Ancient & Classical, PHILOSOPHY / History & Surveys / Ancient & Classical, PHILOSOPHY / Ethics & Moral Philosophy WIDTH: 165 cm SPINE:

      Book Themes:

      Literary studies: ancient, classical and medieval, Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy, Ethics and moral philosophy

      Customer Reviews

      Be the first to write a review
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      0%
      (0)
      Dominic Scott is a professor of philosophy at Oxford University, having worked as a lecturer at Cambridge University and then a professor at the University of Virginia. He has also held visiting positions at Princeton, Harvard, and the Center for Hellenic Studies Washington DC. In 2001-3 he was a British Academy Research Reader and in 2016 a Humboldt Fellow based in Munich. He has written three monographs on ancient philosophy and edited two further books, as well asco-authoring The Humanities World Report 2015.

      Recently viewed products

      Login

      Forgot your password?

      Don't have an account yet?
      Create account